- February 13, 2025
Churchill, Leadership, and the Need for Political Heavyweights
Winston Churchill—a giant of a man, a statesman of unparalleled stature, and a leader whose vision secured our freedom. Few figures in British history have connected with the masses, articulated their party’s vision, and led their country with such determination and strategic brilliance. Charisma, strategy, and an unshakable leadership set Churchill apart, making him one of the greatest political figures of all time. As we mark the 60th anniversary of his funeral, I find myself reflecting on our current political landscape and wondering: where have all the heavyweights gone?
We expect our politicians to be influential, shaping policies, driving public discourse, and leading their parties with conviction. The leaders who once commanded the political arena—figures of real presence and conviction—seem absent today. Instead, we have a class of politicians who, while competent and presentable, lack the force of personality and strategic clarity that once defined the greats.
The Return of Political Heavyweights?
Across the Atlantic, Donald Trump has stormed back into the White House following a landslide victory. Like him or loathe him, he gets things done. Within hours of reassuming office, he had already taken decisive action on immigration, deporting two plane loads of illegal migrants back to Colombia. His leadership style is direct, unapologetic, and action-oriented—qualities that many feel are sorely missing from British politics today.
In the UK, we see no equivalent political powerhouse. Sir Keir Starmer, Kemi Badenoch, Stephen Flynn, Ed Davey—competent, perhaps, but do they inspire? Do they lead with the conviction and force of personality needed to guide the nation through uncertain times? I struggle to think of a single leader today who stands as a true political heavyweight.
A UK-First Approach?
Is it time for British politicians to adopt a more UK-first mindset? Surely, our priorities should include energy independence, national security, food production, and the protection of vital industries. Instead, we find ourselves reliant on foreign resources and policies that seem increasingly disconnected from national interests.
Take energy, for example. The UK imports oil and natural gas despite having ample reserves in the North Sea. Phasing out fossil fuels is necessary, but only when we have a viable replacement that meets demand without making us dependent on imports. Should we, “drill, baby, drill”? Similarly, we import electricity because we have failed to invest sufficiently in nuclear power, phased out coal without adequate alternatives, and neglected our gas-powered infrastructure. Clean energy is an admirable goal—but it must be pursued with energy security in mind.
National Security and Defence: Are We Prepared?
Years of defence cuts have significantly impacted our ability to protect and defend ourselves. Can we honestly say we value our armed forces when our military readiness is so compromised? The Evening Standardreported on March 24, 2024, that the British Army would run out of munitions in just ten days in the event of war. Less than two weeks. If we are committed to supporting Ukraine and maintaining our own defence capabilities, then increasing weapons manufacturing and stockpiling munitions should be a priority. A “just-in-time” supply model may work for retail, but it is reckless when applied to national defence.
Feeding the Nation: Support for British Farmers
Food security is just as vital as energy and defence. Yet, British farmers face an overwhelming tax burden that threatens their livelihoods. Unlike any other profession, farmers work tirelessly in all conditions for wages that often fall below the minimum. They care for their animals, steward the land, and ensure our food supply. If we tax them to the point where farming is no longer viable, we risk not only their livelihoods but also our ability to feed the nation. We must reverse punitive tax policies and support the long-term sustainability of British agriculture.
Protecting Key Industries
Britain’s key industries should be safeguarded—not sacrificed. Part of Donald Trump’s appeal in America is his willingness to speak directly to the concerns of everyday citizens. He champions domestic industries, prioritizes national interests, and refuses to bow to globalist pressures. Perhaps it’s time for Britain to take a similar approach—an approach that puts the UK first.
We need strong leaders with vision, conviction, and the courage to take bold action. The question is: do any of today’s politicians have what it takes to step up and fill that role?